Retired French professor of philosophy states that today’s philosophy depts are masonic brainwashing:

•December 10, 2013 • Comments Off on Retired French professor of philosophy states that today’s philosophy depts are masonic brainwashing:

This is an especially welcome observation since it is EXACTLY what I noticed taking place in the philosophy dept at queen’s (a one time semi decent university that is now humiliated as no longer among the elite due to having become a glorified vocational brainwashing college). One prof in particular even employed the term ‘obscure’ in some of her comments…in other words, she prides herself on bringing the enlightenment of ‘philosophy’ to the unenlightened ‘obscurantism’. Her claim to fame: feminist theory.
The retired prof in the above video states that original philosophers (ie Kant, Schopenhauer) rebelled against the masons. There is no such thing as philosophy today. It has no reason to exist other than as a mystified brand that is used to bolster the credibility of certain people and arguments at certain times. In fact, today’s philosophy depts. spend their time scavenging from sociology, poli sci and law more than anything else.

The retired prof states that from the late ’60s on the masonic influence in philosophy depts became particularly evident and was likely an organized plan to usurp power in philosophy depts so as to use them for political purposes by brainwashing people and controlling culture.

the goods: that strange truth we need to see as fiction is just not going away

•December 9, 2013 • Leave a Comment

This is the first part of many videos in which witnesses are describing elaborate secret networks of ‘metaphorically’ satanic political, economic and judicial corruption that includes bizarre addictions to extreme sexual practices, an organized pedophile network, human sacrifices, and snuff films. It’s clearly transnational. No need to even worry about the gay callboy ring in Washington, or Savile and co at the BBC let alone the Dutroux affaire and the infamous database of child slaves. How crazy are the ambitious take charge leaders of the world?…crazier than you could even dream of!

The 3 layers of conspiracies: a seeker’s guide to investigative reports on the nature of human history.

•August 22, 2013 • Leave a Comment

The first layer is what one might go about proving in a criminal trial. This consists of the plots that various parties have entered into or contributed to for mundane motives. The second layer is the question of whether the behavior and plotting is strictly a calculation based on efficient means to ends or whether it is also motivated by a sociopathic culture. Within this culture is the deviant relationship to concepts of social and moral evils. Such relationships often include what might be viewed as ‘illnesses’ that overlap with or incorporate seemingly supernatural elements. The main query in this layer of analysis is whether the supernatural elements of the cultures are solely based on mundane calculations about how such metaphors and myths impact human behavior within the conspiratorial plot and how it affects the general public or whether it is also believed as reality by the conspirators themselves. The third and final layer of the conspiracies is the question of whether the supernatural beliefs could be taken seriously  as possible explanations by rational and honest enquirers looking in from the outside…after all, a lot of things about human experience remain contentious and we are all operating on a series of presumptions that are probability/credibility choices more than anything else.

Should explanations that question reality beyond the ‘natural’ presumptions be considered or is that a dangerous pastime that may itself be part of a conspiratorial plot to derail certain kinds of personalities? It may play that role and it may even play it on purpose but the question remains: how does one evade the issue of intentional metaphoric evil becoming indistinguishable from literal evil, as in the case, for example, of ‘Satanism/Luciferiansim’?

New World Religion

•August 22, 2013 • 1 Comment

Just because people who get together and conspire can’t always do so without some messy lines in the picture doesn’t mean the world isn’t being driven by conspiracies.

The meta conspiracy is the transition into a system of global commercial governance based on a religious ideology for the world population. This is being undertaken in clean and not so clean ways by the dissemination of information that makes current worldviews uncertain for those on the fringe of society. The direction that such informational overloads are pushing people toward is the resurgence of a religious attitude that is not understood to be what it is. By targeting potential cultural leaders with seemingly conflicting information that discredits the establishment doctrine, the establishment is actually finding a way to move their doctrine safely into the transition that they desire. The primary goal is to condition people to be willing to question their presumptions so that a new worldview, not necessarily cohesive at the beginning, can be imposed on the masses without psychically intact dissent. David Icke and Rael are two sides of the same coin despite one using distrust and the other using bon vivant trusting sexuality. Both are bringing about a new world religion through the fringes of potential new cultures that may impact the masses by delegitimizing old paradigms in favor of a new one that revolves around global identification and aliens. They are on the extreme end of the spectrum of manipulation but the proliferation of discussion and investigation into conspiracies has been intentionally hastened by their campaigns. While some such as Noam Chomsky are (unwittingly or not) gatekeepers of the left, some others are intended to open the gates in certain areas for certain target populations for the same ultimate goal.

It seems obvious that a group of powerful oligarchs operates in secrecy and uses secret organizations such as the Masons to design world history toward certain agreed upon ends. And in fact these oligarchs share certain quasi-mystical religious ideologies with the Masons…worldviews that are being put into place in a certain form right now. Still a long way to go though imo.

unhappy rabbits

•July 31, 2013 • Leave a Comment

The Jewish Question

•July 25, 2013 • Leave a Comment

Let’s be serious. The jews are simply better at being an organized tribe and advancing their various social interests than any other group. No one else on the planet would be much different than them even though they may claim to be less ignoble. The fact is that all humans and all communities are ignoble when you take a close look. That is why I am convinced that the world is indeed run by a satanic force. However, jews simply made their differences of being a scattered and exclusive minority who took over money-lending into an advantage over time and now they have ousted the wasps as the dominant group. Boo hoo! Too bad for the wasps, frankly.

The only thing that is truly reproachable about the jews is that they employ deceit much more than the wasps and they exploit their own victim status, even grossly exaggerating it shamelessly. They also have a sect which believes them to be the equivalent of a Brahmin caste for the planet while others must be inferiors. Such orthodox brahminism is universally condemned, including by most hindus, but for some reason the jews are allowed to reproduce much the same doctrine with impunity. And here is the main difference between jews and wasps and where the jews must take their position of victory and evolve into something better than they needed to be in the past. They must cease and desist with all the manipulative deception and just come clean. Then there will be nothing to reproach them for and they will simply be the victors, not the oppressors.

After this the question will be what to do about the jewish plan to form a world government based on messianic Judaism while gradually admitting inferior goyim into the role of sub-human noahide. This is a bit offensive and I don’t see how most humans would be ok with it. This religious attitude must be dropped. Indeed, they have allied themselves with and influenced the secret society of the masons and that makes much more sense than messianic Judaism. However, again there has been a history of deceit and manipulation to ensure that some groups within masonry hold the controlling positions. These deceptions must be cast aside.

The jig is up now and we all know that the judeo-masonic team has won…great! So now make it work properly instead of succumbing to evil tendencies and Satanism. Let everyone work just a little bit instead of like desperate slaves so that we all have lots of free time to make use of really advanced public benefits like parks, medicare, entertainment, etc. We don’t need to compete anymore since it is now a world governed economy. And let people stay multicultural if they choose to instead of deeming them inferior and indirectly punishing them if they are not judaified. In the meantime, lets have real interbreeding: including with jews! That way no one has to be excluded and no one will really be at odds with the controllers anymore.

Canadian Universities: the perfect cult?

•February 14, 2013 • Leave a Comment

University is the perfect cult since it pretends to justify itself by being the opposite. But since fact, value, and scientific method are ultimately all subject to human interpretation (art) and since numerous variables within large volumes of information create an endless paper chase and a tidal curve that some make a life of trying to keep ahead of both for money and validation through status, it would be a surprise if manipulation and cultic deference were not regular occurrences. In Canada in particular this has become the norm such that real merit is non-existent. It is a fact that TA’s at U of Toronto are selected based on their physical attractiveness and that a recent Governor General’s award to a film prof at Ryerson went to a blown up distorted video of this ‘professor’ getting jacked off by various models…but it is considered high culture and deemed worthy of recognition for its ‘superiority’ since the prof went to establishment schools and comes from a well placed anlgo family. These are just two facts that I am privy to that are kept from the public who is brainwashed into believing some institutions and some people should have more credibility than others.

In light of this, it becomes less surprising that campuses are being intentionally used for sophisticated brainwashing. In fact, brainwashing is likely the only reason for the existence university rankings and for the creation in the ’60s of several strangely useless universities that were all openly branded as ‘leftist’ even though they are controlled by conservative interests. That way anyone who goes along with the brainwashing will be given more credibility when they are accepted as peers in ‘good’ universities while anyone who happens to take up a different opinion will find themselves doing worse at such campuses and will end up finding ‘opportunities’ and better environments at ‘bad’ universities…thereby diminishing the credibility to society of their politically deviant thinking (and their deviant biological origin). Not only that but ‘deviants’ will actually be cultivated for the express purpose of controlling this masquerade. Sometimes they will be groomed for placement in ‘less competitive’ universities to serve as examples of free thinking while being discredited by the greater weight of their colleagues of opposite ideology at ‘better’ universities. And sometimes (especially if they are properly bred) they will be placed in the ‘good’ universities expressly for the purpose of countering the observations I offer here, observations that are not only mine but are shared by many people who are not part of the ‘preferred stock’ of Canadian society which is an particularly casteist one. And as I have mentioned elsewhere on this blog, ‘philosophy’ departments are particularly important in this dirty process by inserting crypto templates for political and cultural spectrums of inquiry within the mysteriously important ‘philosophy’. Skeptics might want to remind themselves that the intentional manipulation of cultural and intellectual capital by the CIA in the world of ‘high art’ in Europe has been exposed and documented by European investigators.

As I have mentioned previously, one of the better examples of the use of a campus for brainwashing is that of Queen’s in Ontario. The spectrum of debate is strictly controlled and the predictable ‘alternative’ viewpoints are carefully managed through selected pseudo-lefitst drama queens. The main offerings of academic faculty outside of the Scottish bigotry of anglo philosophy and conservative politics come in the form of ‘science and technology studies’ (a new stream of narrow and controlled debate) and white anglophone feminism: something which ultimately poses zero threat to establishment doctrines and comes out of a tradition of Scottish racism. Readers still skeptical may wish to look into the recent case of a black female professor who resigned because of the extreme brainwashing and racism that pervaded the faculty and the course content on campus. But do not be fooled by the fact that there are other female professors at Queen’s who may appear to agree with her at selected moments: those are exactly the ones who are most valuable to Queen’s because they actually diminish the public’s (and students’)  perception of the ideological biases that define Queen’s as a university. Their ability to do this comes from the fact that they will take a relatively low-impact issue and inflate it so as to give the appearance of dissent on campus when in reality they are the ones who felt comfortable at Queen’s, were made welcome, and were given tenure because they come out of the same culture and ultimately support the same personal interests as the establishment that tries to inflate the credibility of students who are brainwashed at Queen’s. One white feminist who takes on the meaningless label of ‘philosophy’ comes to mind in particular. She tries to feel important by enjoying her white privileges and basically taking paid vacations to Cuba as a ‘leftist’ while pumping out weak social theory, usually centred around ‘feminism’. Make no mistake though: she likes the status granted to her by the conservative thought police as much as anyone else on that brainwashing campus and chooses to be there for that reason. And, as I have previously mentioned on this blog, like most leftist professors she will in fact be less helpful and less flexible than the others with her students…all the while pretending to be more so, which is especially offensive. Predictably, her leftism is about ‘culture’ and not about political economy…trying to pass off things like Marx and Buddhism as the new mysteriously promising ‘philosophy’. That is not to say that culture is not important. But it is of little impact without material changes in the economy and additionally is reduced to zero impact when the discussion about culture is itself being subverted in subtle ways by only granting full credibility to those whose dissent is in fact minimal. But the impact of this professor is not zero. Its importance is precisely the opposite of what one would initially imagine. The token leftists at Queen’s (and you can probably count them on one hand) are as important to the development (brainwashing) of Canadian society as the other profs because they permit the brainwashing from the rest of the faculty to pass itself off as coming out of a genuine spectrum of debate.

Compare what takes place at Queen’s to what takes place on campuses of continental Europe, which are usually better than Queen’s, and Queen’s comes off as ridiculous. But luckily for the anglos of Canada the discussions of European students and academics are only allowed into Canadian minds selectively through the top down management by the conservative anglos who manipulate and pervert leftist dissent. Still skeptical? Sometimes even an anglo decides to get the fuck out of Queen’s and when they do it is an especially treasured occurrence since it is so rare. Prof. Margaret Beare was faculty at Queen’s for a long time and then left to take a better position at York, cross appointed to Osgoode Hall. She has openly stated in some of her lectures that Queen’s university is mired in its own racist conservative brainwashing, though she uses much softer language.

Queen’s and its friends have been trying to restore its pathetic standing by manipulating the infamous Maclean’s university rankings in its favour…although it won’t ever credibly be better than Mcgill, Toronto, or UBC even by establishment standards. That attempt at restoration, if it is successful, will result in more brainwashing and will contribute to more casteism in Canada. Just as likely though is that Queen’s may never be able to redeem itself from its diminished status…if we are all lucky. Nevertheless, even if Queen’s is seen for what it is the problem of sophisticated brainwashing and unmerited inflation of credibility in Canada through certain universities will not go away. As I suggested above, Toronto is especially good at it.

So unfortunately Canada seems to be stuck in a rather unflattering situation whereby its branding of universities is little more than carefully planned social control. Is that how Canada fosters intellectual development and advantageous contributions from all of its citizenry? Is that how it forms a meritocracy and an egalitarian society? Is that how it responds to its supposed support for ‘pluralistic democracy’? Apparently so.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.