Canadian Universities: the perfect cult?

University is the perfect cult since it pretends to justify itself by being the opposite. But since fact, value, and scientific method are ultimately all subject to human interpretation (art) and since numerous variables within large volumes of information create an endless paper chase and a tidal curve that some make a life of trying to keep ahead of both for money and validation through status, it would be a surprise if manipulation and cultic deference were not regular occurrences. In Canada in particular this has become the norm such that real merit is non-existent. It is a fact that TA’s at U of Toronto are selected based on their physical attractiveness and that a recent Governor General’s award to a film prof at Ryerson went to a blown up distorted video of this ‘professor’ getting jacked off by various models…but it is considered high culture and deemed worthy of recognition for its ‘superiority’ since the prof went to establishment schools and comes from a well placed anlgo family. These are just two facts that I am privy to that are kept from the public who is brainwashed into believing some institutions and some people should have more credibility than others.

In light of this, it becomes less surprising that campuses are being intentionally used for sophisticated brainwashing. In fact, brainwashing is likely the only reason for the existence university rankings and for the creation in the ’60s of several strangely useless universities that were all openly branded as ‘leftist’ even though they are controlled by conservative interests. That way anyone who goes along with the brainwashing will be given more credibility when they are accepted as peers in ‘good’ universities while anyone who happens to take up a different opinion will find themselves doing worse at such campuses and will end up finding ‘opportunities’ and better environments at ‘bad’ universities…thereby diminishing the credibility to society of their politically deviant thinking (and their deviant biological origin). Not only that but ‘deviants’ will actually be cultivated for the express purpose of controlling this masquerade. Sometimes they will be groomed for placement in ‘less competitive’ universities to serve as examples of free thinking while being discredited by the greater weight of their colleagues of opposite ideology at ‘better’ universities. And sometimes (especially if they are properly bred) they will be placed in the ‘good’ universities expressly for the purpose of countering the observations I offer here, observations that are not only mine but are shared by many people who are not part of the ‘preferred stock’ of Canadian society which is an particularly casteist one. And as I have mentioned elsewhere on this blog, ‘philosophy’ departments are particularly important in this dirty process by inserting crypto templates for political and cultural spectrums of inquiry within the mysteriously important ‘philosophy’. Skeptics might want to remind themselves that the intentional manipulation of cultural and intellectual capital by the CIA in the world of ‘high art’ in Europe has been exposed and documented by European investigators.

As I have mentioned previously, one of the better examples of the use of a campus for brainwashing is that of Queen’s in Ontario. The spectrum of debate is strictly controlled and the predictable ‘alternative’ viewpoints are carefully managed through selected pseudo-lefitst drama queens. The main offerings of academic faculty outside of the Scottish bigotry of anglo philosophy and conservative politics come in the form of ‘science and technology studies’ (a new stream of narrow and controlled debate) and white anglophone feminism: something which ultimately poses zero threat to establishment doctrines and comes out of a tradition of Scottish racism. Readers still skeptical may wish to look into the recent case of a black female professor who resigned because of the extreme brainwashing and racism that pervaded the faculty and the course content on campus. But do not be fooled by the fact that there are other female professors at Queen’s who may appear to agree with her at selected moments: those are exactly the ones who are most valuable to Queen’s because they actually diminish the public’s (and students’)  perception of the ideological biases that define Queen’s as a university. Their ability to do this comes from the fact that they will take a relatively low-impact issue and inflate it so as to give the appearance of dissent on campus when in reality they are the ones who felt comfortable at Queen’s, were made welcome, and were given tenure because they come out of the same culture and ultimately support the same personal interests as the establishment that tries to inflate the credibility of students who are brainwashed at Queen’s. One white feminist who takes on the meaningless label of ‘philosophy’ comes to mind in particular. She tries to feel important by enjoying her white privileges and basically taking paid vacations to Cuba as a ‘leftist’ while pumping out weak social theory, usually centred around ‘feminism’. Make no mistake though: she likes the status granted to her by the conservative thought police as much as anyone else on that brainwashing campus and chooses to be there for that reason. And, as I have previously mentioned on this blog, like most leftist professors she will in fact be less helpful and less flexible than the others with her students…all the while pretending to be more so, which is especially offensive. Predictably, her leftism is about ‘culture’ and not about political economy…trying to pass off things like Marx and Buddhism as the new mysteriously promising ‘philosophy’. That is not to say that culture is not important. But it is of little impact without material changes in the economy and additionally is reduced to zero impact when the discussion about culture is itself being subverted in subtle ways by only granting full credibility to those whose dissent is in fact minimal. But the impact of this professor is not zero. Its importance is precisely the opposite of what one would initially imagine. The token leftists at Queen’s (and you can probably count them on one hand) are as important to the development (brainwashing) of Canadian society as the other profs because they permit the brainwashing from the rest of the faculty to pass itself off as coming out of a genuine spectrum of debate.

Compare what takes place at Queen’s to what takes place on campuses of continental Europe, which are usually better than Queen’s, and Queen’s comes off as ridiculous. But luckily for the anglos of Canada the discussions of European students and academics are only allowed into Canadian minds selectively through the top down management by the conservative anglos who manipulate and pervert leftist dissent. Still skeptical? Sometimes even an anglo decides to get the fuck out of Queen’s and when they do it is an especially treasured occurrence since it is so rare. Prof. Margaret Beare was faculty at Queen’s for a long time and then left to take a better position at York, cross appointed to Osgoode Hall. She has openly stated in some of her lectures that Queen’s university is mired in its own racist conservative brainwashing, though she uses much softer language.

Queen’s and its friends have been trying to restore its pathetic standing by manipulating the infamous Maclean’s university rankings in its favour…although it won’t ever credibly be better than Mcgill, Toronto, or UBC even by establishment standards. That attempt at restoration, if it is successful, will result in more brainwashing and will contribute to more casteism in Canada. Just as likely though is that Queen’s may never be able to redeem itself from its diminished status…if we are all lucky. Nevertheless, even if Queen’s is seen for what it is the problem of sophisticated brainwashing and unmerited inflation of credibility in Canada through certain universities will not go away. As I suggested above, Toronto is especially good at it.

So unfortunately Canada seems to be stuck in a rather unflattering situation whereby its branding of universities is little more than carefully planned social control. Is that how Canada fosters intellectual development and advantageous contributions from all of its citizenry? Is that how it forms a meritocracy and an egalitarian society? Is that how it responds to its supposed support for ‘pluralistic democracy’? Apparently so.

David Lynch: Rabbits

Lynch is obsessed with Transcendental Meditation and this seeps into all of his movies, from Blue Velvet on (and earlier in Eraserhead). The suggestion in some film blogs that Rabbits is about purgatory seems most accurate, except that he sees ‘normal’ life experience as a particular illusion that we go through in a purgatory-like process. This process is interconnected over time and space and necessarily limits our full perception of its own reality. I believe the reason Rabbits continues to stand out as one of most frightening viewing experiences to date is that it forces people to become aware of this very unsettling reality that needs to be constantly hidden in order for us to get through the day.

The reality he is always alluding to is that the set of time-space experiences and narratives we are trapped in are all ultimately ‘evil’. There is nothing ‘good’ that we can ‘know’ in our normal set of configurations, other than things that provide relief from the self-motivated spells that make up the world we are part of and provide us with roles to pursue. Though we may not always be able to exercise it or be aware of it, we do have a conscience, in part due to the experience and recollection of suffering and in part because we can imagine what it would be like to be another. Our limited conscience takes the role it does because we are not what we think we are and, according to Lynch, play interchangeable roles in a multi-layered web of interactive phenomena designed to satisfy self-interest at the expense of altruism. The best we can have is final release from the self-identified interests that shape experiences according to the worldly set of phenomena aptly represented by Hollywood, its spectacles, its business deals, and its popularized culture. During our myopic pursuit of both success in, and escape from, the beautiful evil of coloured lights and passions, we take up several lives during which opportunities to exercise a moral choice arise at unexpected junctures in an otherwise tightly fitted mesh of interconnected determinations. Since we only experience time and space in order to cater to individualistic desire in relation to diverse others, the interchanging lives occur simultaneously in the same and different spaces in the same and different bodies and lives. (Bullshit alert: I have no idea how this works. If anyone reading this can help me out I welcome your input.) However, in order for the experiential drama to have the desired effect, the individual’s narrative experiences must be discrete. This means memory is lacking and selective, and that limitations are imposed upon the perception of supernatural or other agents of good or bad that hover in our midst, participate in our story lines, and conspire with our deepest motivations along the way. For this reason, the Rabbits, who try but are unable to remember certain things, are merely and helplessly aware that ‘Something is wrong’. They live in dissociation from the full horror of their evil trappings, supporting each other in drones of inanities and distractions that bear no correspondence to the ultimate truth of what they are and what they are doing. Their inability to access their full reality and its abhorrent implication is randomly punctuated with canned laughter from an imaginary audience, forcing the viewer to recognize their own familiar participation in the collective alienation of truth.

The laughter, which implicitly places the Rabbits’ living room within the comfortable territory of ‘sit-coms’, fails to yield its superficially suggested light-heartedness. Instead, the viewer is disturbingly turned into an involuntary collaborator in the inversion of their own habituated values. As the foolishness of our efforts to make sense of the confusingly humourless dialogue in the midst of a grim social trio jiving deadpan between menacing industrial noises begins to dawn on us like a sinister prank, we gradually identify the source of our gripping anxiety and, like a convict resigned to enjoy his last meal, we break with our normal viewing habits. Events and details unfold in seeming disorder. There are two females and one male. There is apparently a man in a green suit they await eagerly and there are references to a dog and very unglamorous violence. Perhaps the man in the green suit is that actor or catalyst which brings initiation (and cyclical finality) to a story, as in ‘green means go’. The dog might be the impassioned ‘natural’ violence un-preventably unleashed upon a Rabbit at certain junctures, perhaps permitting the release of one of the three from the drudgery of their current story line, which may be worldly manifestation in general. The trio of Rabbits consists of one male and two women. One woman is more domestic and does the ironing in a corner while the other appears more as a counterpart to the male Rabbit and also sits on the couch. It is this female Rabbit ‘[who might have been] a blonde’. Though not necessarily the case in Rabbits,  we might view the female roles to be less varied though equally or more numerous as has been the case in other Lynch films. In Rabbits it is the male who appears to be the one who is active with the outside world while the women are, at least in this respect, passive. That may be because Lynch’s belief in TM convinces him that the female incarnation belongs to certain predetermined roles in a limited set of stories in this world. They usually go from innocent (desired) to corrupted (feared) and from nurturing to entrapping over the course of several female lives. It might be worth noting that it is the more matronly version of the feminine gender (the one ironing in the corner) who also brings out ritualistic candles during incomprehensible aural communications with a demon and later does not appear to fully remember or understand. This may be Lynch’s way of suggesting that even the most seemingly uninvolved person who takes a ‘passive’ maternal role is nevertheless a participating actor in the ‘agreement’ of sacrifices and limitations necessary for this world to unfold, just as a spectator might be when enjoying a representational drama or a parent might be when managing a family from a seemingly passive position of compassionate authority. It seems then that for Lynch, female life stories hold their greatest significance in the varying degrees of conscious or unconscious complicity they entail in the realization of the unwholesome desires of varying active males, desires which overlap with the ones that placed all individual lives in the darkly set dynamic of the world that Lynch exposes. That female incarnations are typically enabled toward more passively complicit roles does not change their ultimate fate because the experience as a male or female is as illusory as any materially experienced individuality since all the manifestations of human life are interconnected within a causal network whereby pleasure necessitates corollary suffering as a relation and a cost. On a more limited scale the story could be about a satanic ritual, incest, or the meaninglessly pornographic nature of life and human motivation but in keeping with TM Lynch makes a broader interpretation most apparent.

Indeed, the very premise for our lives is an evil one.  Some have postulated that in Rabbits a human sacrifice is being alluded to. In a sense that is correct since we all sacrifice each other at various times in order to realize unhealthy pleasures at some other point during the intertwining of events. In so doing, we appear to have agreed, wittingly or not, to sacrifice the very self-interest that drives us to enter the theatre of individuated desire in the first place. That is why we humans are rabbit-like, like Lynch’s perceptually and emotionally dispossessed Rabbits. The rabbit stands out as a unique creature for one reason: humans use rabbits for both affection (pets) and food (hunted and killed). Lynch is reminding us that we not only have a peculiar habit of both nurturing and eating a furry animal who makes up a large part of our culture, but that we even treat each other with the same insisted upon hypocrisy innate to the role we attribute to rabbits. David Lynch’s Rabbits imposes upon us with a deeply disturbing and uncompromising reminder: that the selves and stories we hold so dear in our personal waking narrative are paradoxically harvested for a lapsed experience of simultaneous violence and affection. By shocking us into bearing witness to our culpability in a nightmare based on the inescapable unification of lust and terror he forces us to acknowledge what we spend our time intentionally ignoring because it is so unacceptable.

Is it possible to have a healthy ‘normal’ life while in full apprehension of this terrifying truth? I believe the answer is no. Do Lynch’s movies thereby fulfill their purpose? Or do we fail when we emerge from viewing his movies shaken but unchanged and eager to ‘re-normalize’ ourselves?

<insert laughter here>

the satanists will laugh…

We are trapped against our will in a confusing matrix of evil with absolutely no way of knowing why or what we are or are a part of.
It is extremely frightening. It is so extremely frightening that almost everyone spends most of their energy feeding delusional states of mind supported by social consensus.It is a blind nightmare to which we attempt to appendage examples of ‘good’ out of fear and desperation that is so intense that we have detached ourselves from it and alienated ourselves from awareness, including the full use of our five sensory perceptions.

The extreme fear is due to the knowledge that there is no good other than relief from the evil out of which this unexplained self-manifestation necessarily exists to begin with. The lack of knowledge about any of the evil phenomena of self-manifestation in ‘world’ means that even suicide is potentially unsafe and the evil nightmare continues to abuse and torture.

Similar to pascal’s wager, when the extreme fear and anxiety is allowed to manifest sufficiently to stimulate a decision to break the structure of the satanic spell cast as worldly phenomena, and that decision is understood cautiously as breaking the self even through suffering in order to help others trapped in the evil, then this possible fleeting window of opportunity to exercise free will must absolutely be taken.

Just in case this is an occasion of free will and the inspiration to leave the web of evil manifests it must be acted upon as much as possible since if it is predestined or predetermined, no matter, but if it is a window of free will to leave the evil the potential benefit is immeasurable. Even if it means some suffering, as long as it is voluntarily tolerated for the goal of breaking the satanic mind control spell of the material world by providing another victim with relief it is the only possibility of good and as such is beyond comparison to any other consideration. There are others who are victims of world manifestation to whom your relief and/or assistance to also escape from the evil by breaking the satanically constructed manifestation of self in world is the only action that may save you from the unending spiral of interconnected evil.

At first the ‘good’ that you provide through self-sacrifice to another may only be, as always, temporary relief from evil and is only positive in its opposition to the evil norm. However, by taking the opportunity when it presents itself it may be that the evil trap of you will be increasingly freed from the phenomena of evil interrelations such that an independent state of good currently not rationally sensible will be available, and eventually perhaps also the increasing possibility of autonomous ability to actively create phenomena of goodness independent and unsusceptible to the evil of our current state.

But it is irrelevant at the moment as all that can be known is that you must kill the disease that is your manifested self as part of the web of evil by breaking the participation in the satanic spell through incongruous action. If this incongruous action frees the victims who are inexplicably bound by the network of evil (that is human experience) by allowing for eventual annihilation then this could be the one possible chance to escape the evil.

The satanists will laugh and/or patronize you and that should be a good sign. The more you are incongruous to them and the rational world due to breaking yourself for another, the more you are gaining escape from the clutches of the evil.

Until a proof of ‘god’ manifests, the religions can only be treated as escapist delusions. That may be better and even a necessary and potentially beneficial excursion but the religions will never grant full and final extrication from the evil if no actual (and real) God experience is ever allowed, which appears to be the case.

So if you can stumble upon the window of this inspiration and realization, it must be seized as advised by many possible saints including ‘Jesus’ and ‘Buddha’ among others. If you feel you may be able to act to break the evil by killing you in world through direct action for other victims, this feeling must be harboured as much as possible and acted upon. It is the most important moment during the drama of the evil dream we helplessly incorporate as operants of experience.

jslfkjsal

Phukwiv Mien Dai

This is a new self-defense system invented by unassuming longtime abused ex-lawyer with background in karate and being beaten.

In some ways similar to hapkido, it uses a combination of karate, wing-chun, and aikido as the base with some addition of judo, brasilian jujitsu, boxing and improvised available objects as weapons for murderous survival.

It is not meant to be useful for actual brawling or to prove anything. It is not meant to look good or help gain popularity. It is specifically designed for loser outcasts who have neither the natural physique nor the personality for fighting to protect themselves when abused, by any means necessary.

As an ex-lawyer, the founder incorporates legal issues into the training and conditioned responses so that people know when they can resort to efficient and potentially lethal responses in order to avoid physical assault and public or private humiliations without being charged with a crime (since they are acting in self-defense).

This is a style that would be guaranteed to fail in the ufc or similar theaters but that may well succeed in real life for its stated purposes. The purpose is to allow the abused person to neutralize their opponent so that they can evade and continue to live freely.

The punches include boxing and standard straight karate punches as well as wing chun striking and karate based kicks, knees and elbows but the primary strike is a wing chun adaptation that is also found in some styles of karate as the ‘sparring punch’. These short quick and precise straight punches are the main response followed by aikido-like joint breaking if necessary. During a melee, judo and jujitsu submissions may also become necessary.

Finishing according to wing chun attitudes is taught so that at the first opportunity quick blows to key zones such as eyes, throat/adam’s apple, groin, or solar plexus are employed or immediate breakage of a joint if possible. Key positionings for landing strikes at the chin such as to KO someone (ie upsetting the jaw from the side to jar the skull into blackout) are also taught but are not relied upon as much. Clawing, gouging, and biting are also encouraged as is mobility that enables one to strike the person from their back, preferably in the back of the head at the base. Finally, at any appropriate point during a melee, practitioners are encouraged to develop creative improvisations of found objects available to use as potentially lethal weapons. Since the people for whom this style is suited do not start fights, it is always ethically sound.

The training method is similar to krav maga but the style is different. Real life full contact fight is the emphasis in the training but it is not aggressive nor is it about extended fighting. It is about survival as one who is not suited to fight physically or psychologically and knows it, one who in fact never truly wants to fight, but one who is being abused and thus must end the abuse with extreme prejudice. The shorter the fight the better and if the opponent must die for the abused to be free, good riddance.

Interaction with the experienced street fighting community is encouraged as these people have a lot that the Phukwiv Mien Dai community can learn from, however it is only useful insofar as it improves our ability to adapt our style to our needs and specifications ie we do not and know that we cannot be full out ‘fighters’ so we use fighting wisdom for what would work for us, not for a showy brawler in good physical condition.

The biggest problem (When is lemonade just piss?)

she is a mentally and emotionally retarded ass-wipe. he is a sophisticated classroom experiment (no longer a human) undertaken by the satanic prerogatives of the empire. both are sub-human for being so severely retarded in social, emotional and sexual development.

she is racist yet chose to marry a socially imbecilic campus paki because she is so conditioned to settle for less and then claim she is successful for ‘making lemonade’. her version of ‘love’ is finding weak reasons to settle for a humanoid of a race that she considers to be genetically inferior and socially fatal yet she will exploit it in efforts to escape her shallow puddle of piss existence.

this version of her ‘love’ is what she then she doles out to her children by eagerly exploiting their suffering so as to give herself a role as having the emotional upper hand. apparently she does not care that this necessitates her own offspring’s failure in life. When she does not get to do that she repeatedly attempts to bring her children down to her diseased level by degenerating emotionally with them. so either she tries to bring them down or she acts superior when they are down…but for her benefit and not theirs. in either case she is not only failing but is imposing the burden of her disease on her own offspring.

unlike some women who marry outside of their white enclaves she is not doing so for true love or for excitement or even merely for political or ideological satisfaction. she is truly finding a way to make lemonade by marrying what she views as a sub-human and then pretending that pseudo-hippy jargon can justify her. the problem is that she is not and never was a part of any counter-culture, and the main reason that is the case is that she does not have the strength of character, the emotional maturity or even the intellectual sophistication to be an organic part of such a social movement (no matter how bogus it might have been for the most part).

in the meantime she suppresses her sexuality (which is clearly never satisfied by the lemonade) and every time the one white hypocrite male who patronizes her campus paki does his deceptive socialist duty by showing up to a pathetic invite from said husband (a request…no, let’s face it, more like a plea) she struggles not to pander to him (the white hypocrite) like a dirty schoolgirl in special ed heat.

don’t let that put you off though because then you’ll fail to notice that the campus paki spends his time masturbating to porno and acting like an emotionally and sexually retarded colonial monkey falling all over his female students…but only the ones who are pure breed german. I SHIT YOU NOT.

punchline: he made a career out of going off the rails over racism and western imperialism, destroying marxism in the process, much to the delight of those he was railing against.

did he help any social cause or accomplish anything? absolutely nothing…unless you consider creating and unnecessarily destroying human life an accomplishment. but hey, who cares about that right?

Idea for play/movie: ‘Oh Ji’: Canadien (original and only legit spelling of the word which is french) Migrant??

Like all posts here, this is a draft, a work in progress. In this case it is also a creative experiment.

Draft of ideas from scene in play:

1. Why would anyone choose to be a migrant??

2. Why would their offspring be happy about being demoted from birth within the host society??

3. Migrancy is a racial phenomenon more than anything else. The classism is the premise but racial differences are evidently at play. Are Russian migrants more likely not to be racist or racialist? I am not sure.

4. Both environmental and genetic factors form human outcomes of performance and potential. But are there genetic inferiorities to caucasianism among dark genetic groups?

5. Yes there are according to several well educated academics and researchers within many disciplines including hard and soft sciences.

6. Phillip Rushton has many studies from which he argues east asians are slightly superior to caucasians (who form his benchmark) while other non whites are inferior. He includes Roma and south asians as averaging the same as blacks in the range of borderline idiot as compared to whites. He uses the raven progressive matrix test.

7. What does he say about jews? I do not know yet. However, he makes a clear distinction between jews and other north africans, mid easterners, and south asians which are all to be viewed in the same category of average performance (85 vs white 100).

8. There are obviously ways of challenging all his studies and the conclusions derived from them. However, the challenges can only create more speculation not more solid evidence.

9. It is obvious that large numbers of whites and members of the elite establishment support his views regardless of how public discourse is arranged on this topic because he got his funding for his initial controversial study out of U Western Ontario from the Rockefeller Foundation and continues to be supported in various ways by elite groups. His arguments and supporting studies are published in established biology journals in Britain.

10. Rather than wasting time with the same old issues I will summarize what I think is informed wisdom on this topic: those with the gun end up having the highest ‘IQ’. Whoever gets the gun first wins. Once you lose you have to either be phased out through gradual breeding strategies or you have to go to war as a non-equiped loser: clandestine deception and ‘cheating’ and/or terrorism. The choice is yours but the only alternative is generational slavery and more humiliation.

11. This last choice is totally unacceptable since it is humiliation to begin with that appears to have the most impact on human development. Indeed, the final insight is just that. Those who are on a roll and properly organized to mutually support their interests relative (ie in opposition to) others will always reach a far higher potential than otherwise.

12. That potential has never been tested properly since only one group of monkeys picked up the rock to hit the other ones over the head first and has always had the barrel in the other monkeys’ mouths since then.

13. The most interesting among these monkeys are jews. They claim to have been oppressed in the past and apparently scored as retards when first ‘migrating’ to the US. Now they rule the world along with the old feudal dynasties of europe…as has always been the case. Why the anomaly during part of the 1900s?

14. If indeed the non-whites (other than ‘chinks/nips/gooks’ etc as many supporters of racialist theories would call them, though I would not use such terms) are inferior then what exactly is going on on the planet?? I do not believe it is appropriate to manage them as one might do with wildlife nor do I view such management, if that is how it is to be understood, as having unfolded as anything other than satanic slavery.

15. Are the Chinese chosen to be the blend with the whites and jews for the next phase of human history? It would seem so.

16. Are we supposed to believe in manifest destiny? Again, it would seem so. If that is correct then all non-whites and non-east asians should be exterminated. Any providence that exploits and humiliates them as slaves is the providence of a diabolical, not divine, force.

17. If they are not exterminated painlessly then it is their natural mandate to reverse the power relations so that they have the gun barrel in the mouth of the whites and jews (and maybe east asians as well).

18. It is obvious and easy to understand how a criminal or a dysfunctional person can be created through circumstance and how that can, when coupled with humiliation and some leadership along with desperation and irrevocable cheapening of this life, easily develop into ‘terrorism’.

19. The fact that everyone was told that that was not an adequate explanation for 911 is evidence of conspiracy and/or psychological (ie non-cognitive) barriers to awareness and understanding. In other words, ‘mental age’ can be manipulated through emotions that have to do with power relations and social consensus.

20. Supposing there is some truth to the racialist theory (which I’m quite willing to do), the next question is whether races are manufactured so that identification with a race is bogus and all should be eugenically planned for the future…obviously the answer is yes. Do the whites and jews have a problem with this? I don’t. I would not pass on my genes and I don’t care. Should whites not care that their genes will not all be passed on? They must mix with Chinese. But should they? Or should the Chinese be taking over completely in the end?

21. The other question is why the socially fucked over would ever agree to the international socialism (deference to newly evolving global governance authorities) that is now being pushed (btw the multiple examples of ‘cooperation in nature’ circulating the web news pages are tiresome). Lets get this straight now: before we were pissed on and told that society is about rugged individuals who cooperate competitively according to plural but separate interests…but now that we are moving into the next phase of global choreography the dance is changing and we should no longer protect out interests but instead agree to become more socialistic and find ‘common interest’, presumably in accordance with what we are taught as objective by the ruling whites.

Listen carefully: F-U-C-K  Y-O-U.

22. After having our lives satanically ruined for generations before for not being the bossy monkeys with the gun we’re now told to learn the new script that now suits the whites and jews?? NO FUCKING WAY. If the only real solution is war lets go, follow your own bullshit mantra and ‘just do it’. Otherwise bring the restitution and reorganization that is egalitarian (yes, we know that won’t happen so as I said: YES YOU WANT. TOTAL WAR.) We are already dead so don’t pretend you can reverse that now.

Comments are welcome as long as they are civil and constructive.